Creating Derived Tables Using LookML Reviews

Maksym P. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

JaeHoon L. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

VEDA SAI MANOGNA N. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

need help to do this

P M. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Євгеній О. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Yash P. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Oleksandr Z. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

nice

G.ABHINAI G. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Maksym C. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Daniel C. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

shailaja G. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

AJITHA GNANA MALGIYA 2. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Carlos A. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

George Q. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

다시 하겠습니다.

Choong ho L. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

크 실. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Jinbeom K. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

CheolGyun L. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Aditya R. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

세은 배. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Pragathi R. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

not very clear... this is not true: Now that the derived table has been persisted, the previous CTE identified by the WITH clause is no longer present and has been replaced by a SELECT statement querying fields from the order_details_summary persistent derived table. nothing changed in fact (not even in the picture that should demonstrate it)

Ruud L. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Grishma G. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Kalpesh S. · Reviewed about 1 month ago

Sana K. · Reviewed about 1 month ago