Creating Derived Tables Using LookML Reviews

Parth J. · Reviewed 6 days ago

Maksym P. · Reviewed 6 days ago

JaeHoon L. · Reviewed 6 days ago

VEDA SAI MANOGNA N. · Reviewed 6 days ago

need help to do this

P M. · Reviewed 6 days ago

Євгеній О. · Reviewed 6 days ago

Yash P. · Reviewed 6 days ago

Oleksandr Z. · Reviewed 6 days ago

nice

G.ABHINAI G. · Reviewed 6 days ago

Maksym C. · Reviewed 6 days ago

Daniel C. · Reviewed 6 days ago

shailaja G. · Reviewed 6 days ago

AJITHA GNANA MALGIYA 2. · Reviewed 6 days ago

Carlos A. · Reviewed 6 days ago

George Q. · Reviewed 6 days ago

다시 하겠습니다.

Choong ho L. · Reviewed 6 days ago

크 실. · Reviewed 6 days ago

Jinbeom K. · Reviewed 6 days ago

CheolGyun L. · Reviewed 7 days ago

Aditya R. · Reviewed 7 days ago

세은 배. · Reviewed 7 days ago

Pragathi R. · Reviewed 7 days ago

not very clear... this is not true: Now that the derived table has been persisted, the previous CTE identified by the WITH clause is no longer present and has been replaced by a SELECT statement querying fields from the order_details_summary persistent derived table. nothing changed in fact (not even in the picture that should demonstrate it)

Ruud L. · Reviewed 7 days ago

Grishma G. · Reviewed 7 days ago

Kalpesh S. · Reviewed 7 days ago